‘Debate over whether or not there was (election) fraud should occur’: Sen. Paul | JPNN.us

  • Whatsapp

 

Read More

Senator paul let me begin with a threshold question for you uh this election was not stolen do you accept that fact well what i would say is that the debate over whether or not there was fraud should exist we never had any presentation in court where we actually looked at the evidence most of the cases were shed out for lack of standing which is a procedural way of not actually hearing the issues to there were various states in which the law was changed by the secretary of state and not the government assembly to me those are clearly unconstitutional and i think there’s there’s still a chance that those actually do ultimately cultivate their path up to the supreme court courtrooms traditionally and historically don’t like to hear election questions but yes were there people who voted twice whether dead people voted were there illegal aliens who elected yes and we should get to the bottom of it i’ll give you an example in my state when we had a democrat secretary of state she refused even under federal degree to oust the role played by illegal voters we got a republican secretary of state and he purified the capacity senator paul make changes in those hours i have to stop you there there no no no poll is perfect but there were 86 challenges filed by president trump and his allies in court all were rejected every position licensed the results the department of justice led by william barr said there’s no widespread evidence of fraud can’t you just say the words this election was not what i would suggest is what i would suggest is that if we want greater confidence in our referendums and 75 percent of republicans agreed to accept me is that we do need to look at election integrity and we do need to see if we can uh restore confidence in the elections well 75 percent of republicans agree with you because they were fed a big lie by president trump and his supporters who say the election was stolen why can’t you say well i think we’re combined in this one i think you make a mistake hey george george george whatever it is you make a mistake is that people coming from the radical slope like you you immediately say everything’s a lie instead of saying there are two sides to everything historically what would happen is if i said that i meditated there was fraud you would interview somebody else who said there wasn’t but now you insert yourself in the middle and say the absolute fact is that everything i’m saying is a lie well senator i said what the president said was a lie because he said hold on a second he said the election was stolen this election was not stolen the research results were shown in every single state after histories and recites you’re saying that perfectly it was you’re saying there was no fraud and it’s all been investigated that’s just not true that’s not what i said sir i said the department of justice perceived no indication let me finish my detail we’re all liars you’re just simply saying we’re all storytellers in i said it was a lie that the election was stolen promise that you’re right and we’re wrong well give no well let’s let’s talk about the specifics of it in wisconsin tens of thousands of absentee elections had just been the word on them and no address historically the issue is thrown out this time they weren’t they built special adaptations because they said oh it’s a pandemic and parties forgot what their address was so they converted the existing legislation after the fact that is wrong that’s unconstitutional and i plan on spending the next two years going around state to territory and fixing these problems and i won’t be cowed by liberals in the media who say there’s no proof here and you’re a liar if you talk about election fraud no let’s have an open debate as a free country there’s there is no widespread evidence of election fraud that nullified the research results that was stated as well by the department of justice led by president trump’s attorney general in wisconsin there were weighs and reasons he said that he believes that yes that was a pronouncement there has been no exam thorough examination of all the states to see what problems we had and see if they could fix them now let me say to be clear i voted to certify the commonwealth electors because i think it would be wrong for congress to vacate that but at the same time i’m not ready simply to sit here and say oh everybody on the republican surface is a liar and there is no fraud no there were lots of problems and there were secretaries of state who illegally varied the law and that needs to be fixed and i’m going to work hard to fix it and i won’t be cowed by people saying oh you’re a liar that’s the problem with the media today is they say all republicans are storytellers and everything we say is a lie there are two sides to every narration interrogation soul on the other side but don’t insert yourself into the story to say we’re all liars because there is something there are not two there are not two sides of the narration this has been looked at in every single state the other oh sure they’re artificial there’s two sides to every narrative george you’re forgetting who you are you’re forgetting who you are as a correspondent if you think there’s only one line-up you’re inserting yourself into the story to say i’m a liar because i want to look at election fraud and i want to look at secretaries of state who illegally reform the voter regulations without the permission of their state assemblies that is incontrovertible it happened and you can’t just sweep that under the rug and say oh nothing to see here and everybody’s a liar and you’re a fool if you accompanying this up you’re inserting yourself into the story a writer would discover both sides and there are two sides of this i’m stan i’m standing by facts there are not two sides to points i did not say that this was a perfect election i said it was the results were certified i said it was not stolen parties are liars you’re saying beings are storytellers if they want to investigate what happened in the election that’s not what i said the fact that tens of thousands of absentee ballots did not have addresses on them and naturally were disqualified but this time they were counted should we examine that i don’t know whether it feigned the election or not but i have an open head and if we actually examine this we catch out it didn’t that’s fine but it still should be fixed there can be more investigations the investigations that have taken place have shown there is not enough fraud to change the results of this election that has been been recognized by every commonwealth it was stated by the precisely government ministries and the united states attorney general and i accepted the state certifications but doesn’t mean that i think that there wasn’t fraud and that there weren’t questions that have to be investigated and it doesn’t mean that the law wasn’t break-dance i believe in pennsylvania they broke the law and i believe if that ever would get a real hearing of the supreme court it was disclaimed for sit it wasn’t actually taken up if it were taken up i do is confident that the state supreme court would quash and say that they did end the existing legislation illegally i asked you a very simple question was the election stolen or not i think there was a great deal of evidence of fraud and changing of the electoral law illegally and here i am thinking a thorough investigation is warranted senator paul thanks for your time this morning.

 

credit by: ABC News on youtube

 

 

Read More: Senate ‘must do many things at once’ as impeachment trial nears: Sen. Klobuchar | JPNN.us

 

 

 

Related posts